October 2, 2021 – Monterey Herald
Couple support Pacific Grove hotel construction project
We have been living in our residence just up the street from the American Tin Cannery in Pacific Grove since 1984, so we know the location very well and are writing to you to express our support for this hotel / commercial project. We understand that the changes requested by all concerned have been resolved.
The benefits to Pacific Grove are very significant and will generate increases in property and sales taxes and other revenues. In addition, the aesthetics of the property will enhance the neighborhood for years to come.
Thanks to everyone who supports this business.
– Ed and Lois Shedlowski, Pacific Grove
Adding some history to the planned hotel debate
I want to add my voice to the chorus of locals who approve of the conversion of the American Tin Cannery to a hotel site. Critics of this project lack some historical perspective that is necessary to judge the plan. I worked at ATC from 1986 to 1997. I saw the transformation of the Ardan catalog store into an outlet mall with 55 stores and restaurants. During the 1990s, ATC became very successful as a shopping destination and attracted many customers – the vast majority were out of town visitors and Bay Area day trippers. The traffic impacts created by a full 55-store mall were far greater than anything the proposed hotel will generate. The cognitive dissonance of the critics is that they fail to recognize this important point. If the owners of ATC were so motivated, they could convert the site back into a full-fledged mall. Once again, it would attract thousands of visitors and buyers – all allowed by the terms of the license to use that built the mall. The owners’ current plan for the facility is much less intensive than the use of the mall. This will ultimately benefit Pacific Grove, generating the tax revenue necessary to pay for the very services critics of the project seem to favor. Let the conversion go ahead.
– Mark Carbonaro, Monterey
Feminists should look at the other side of abortion
In her 9/24/21 commentary in the Monterey Herald, Megan McArdle points out that feminists have supported “My Body, My Choice,” but there is another body involved. Feminists must be honest.
I have had a number of women tell me that they have had an abortion. Some also added how old the child would be that day if he had lived. These women are suffering.
For 12 years, I was an adoption social worker for Monterey County. We have never had a problem finding good homes for babies.
I wish more women would choose adoption over abortion
– Marjorie Atkinson, Seaside
Fixed recording about Hitler, WWII
The recent September 22 letter, “Historical Facts,” is filled with inaccurate information. A glaring example is the claim that Germany allied with the Soviet Union during World War II. Say what? From the moment America entered the war, the Soviets allied with the United States and Great Britain. After the defeat of Germany, the Soviet Union entered the Pacific War to help America defeat the Japanese. This is the 101 story.
Was Hitler a socialist or a communist? Did he believe in democracy? No in all respects; when he took power, he pretended to support democracy but quickly overthrew it: he said he would “destroy democracy using the tools of democracy” (sounds familiar to you?). He despised socialism and communism and swore “to destroy Marxism in all its forms and forms” and later added that it “exists to serve international Jewish finance” (“Mein Kampf”)
Hitler was a fascist: the German people were required to show total submission to his nationalist, white supremacist and far-right program. The swastika and the Nazi salute were imitators of symbols of Italian fascism; scapegoats (Jews, homosexuals, Gypsies, non-Aryans) were persecuted / executed as Nazism gained influence, the irrational became concrete; unspeakable evil has become ordinary.
Democrats and President Biden have nothing in common with Hitler and Nazi Germany.
– Judy Ritchie, Pebble Beach