No Peace Dividend Again – OpEd – Eurasia Review
Back in the days when the Soviet Union collapsed, there was a lot of talk of a peace dividend – a sharp cut in US government spending on militarism. The dividends of peace did not come. Instead, the U.S. government began to spend heavily on the military and engage in a series of military actions across the world, including, as the Soviet Union dissolved. , the first of two invasions of Iraq by the US military.
Today, some 30 years after the demise of the Soviet Union, U.S. servicemen are still stationed across Europe, as well as on ships near Russia, ready to counter the ghost of the red spread.
Special interests behind the scenes worked overtime in the 1990s to ensure that the money continued to flow into the military-industrial complex. The containment of the Soviet threat evaporated as an excuse, but people found new excuses.
Ron Paul explained the transition in his April 2013 comments on the founding of his Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. Paul declared:
The Cold War, as we now know, was itself widely publicized by the beneficiaries of the military build-up, but at the very least we should have expected at the end of the thousands of missiles pointed at us some sort of dividend. the peace. Instead, thanks to those whose careers and fortunes depended in some way on the military-industrial complex, we stumbled from the end of the war on communism to the war to control the world. This war has failed.
Much of the failed US government’s “war to control the world” is the war in Afghanistan. After a 20 year war with an estimated cost of more than two trillion dollars which caused destruction of Afghan infrastructure and large-scale lives, the US military left Afghanistan. The invasion and occupation of Afghanistan had failed to achieve “nation-building” goals such as women’s liberation the goal of then-first lady Laura Bush, promoted to Afghanistan in November 2001 as her husband’s replacement in her weekly address to Presidential Radio and the fight against corruption a goal promoted by President Barak Obama in a speech in December 2009. When US troops left, Afghanistan largely returned to its pre-war status, made worse by the ravages of war.
But, at least can we get some sort of peace dividend because of the end of the US government’s longest war? Nope. It appears that President Joe Biden and the US Congress intend to ensure that spending on militarism continues to rise nonetheless. With the war in Afghanistan in the rearview mirror, politicians in Washington, DC and special interests that benefit from foreign interventions, including the war, are now focusing on news. “monsters to destroy“Just like the people who ran the show in DC were focused when the Cold War ended.
In a Sunday The Intercept article, Peter Maass provided details of how politicians in Washington, DC appear to be ensuring that there will be no peace dividends again, with legislation making its way to the Congress which orders military spending to increase next year despite the end of the War in Afghanistan. You can read Maass’s article here.
This article was published by RonPaul Institute.